Current:Home > MyConservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett shows an independence from majority view in recent opinions -WealthX
Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett shows an independence from majority view in recent opinions
View
Date:2025-04-25 00:28:19
WASHINGTON (AP) — During her Senate confirmation hearings, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett uttered a memorable line to describe her approach to cases: “It’s not the law of Amy.”
Barrett cemented the Court’s conservative supermajority four years ago and has since voted in favor of overturning the nationwide right to abortion, striking down affirmative action in college admissions and expanding gun rights. Still, during the most recent term that included sweeping blows to federal regulation and key wins for former President Donald Trump, her opinions reflected a willingness at times to step away from the conservative majority.
Barrett wrote sharp dissents in a case connected with the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and another on regulation of downwind air pollution. Appointed by Trump, she differed on some points of the former president’s historic immunity ruling and critiqued parts of the majority decision keeping him on the ballot.
“While she is very firmly rooted in the conservative bloc, she doesn’t necessarily move in lockstep with the rest of the court’s conservatives. There are these surprising glimmers of independence,” said Melissa Murray, law professor at New York University.
In the Trump immunity case, Barrett joined the majority overall but disagreed with the finding that restricted the evidence prosecutors can use in criminal cases against presidents. “The Constitution does not require blinding juries to the circumstances surrounding conduct for which Presidents can be held liable,” she wrote.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Democracy: American democracy has overcome big stress tests since 2020. More challenges lie ahead in 2024.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
- Read the latest: Follow AP’s complete coverage of this year’s election.
And while the majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts directed lower courts to analyze whether Trump could be prosecuted on allegations that he participated in a scheme to enlist fake electors in battleground states, Barrett wrote that she saw “no plausible argument” for barring prosecution of that part of the indictment.
“Her opinion is basically a roadmap for how the case could have gone forward,” said Steve Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown University.
“We’re seeing, I think, the emergence of Justice Barrett as a principled voice in the middle of the court,” he said, adding however that the impact is muted by Roberts’ vote landing further right.
The two were on opposite sides in the Jan. 6 case, with Barrett writing in a dissent that Roberts and the majority had done “textual backflips” to reach the opinion that makes it harder for prosecutors to charge rioters with obstruction.
The court was unanimous in the decision to keep Trump on the ballot, but Barrett wrote in a concurrence that she thought the majority went further than necessary — while also chiding the court’s liberal wing for the “stridency” of its separate concurrence.
“She’s not always looking at it from the same perspective as her colleagues on the left or the right, and I think we’re going to see more of that uniqueness,” said Adam Feldman, a scholar and creator of the blog Empirical SCOTUS.
She also differed with a decision halting an Environmental Protection Agency plan to fight air pollution. Joining with the high court’s liberal justices, she wrote a dissent referring to majority arguments as “feeble,” saying they had relied on “cherry-picked” data and downplayed the EPA’s role.
Roberts and Barrett did join sides on an limited order allowing emergency abortions to resume for women in Idaho. Barrett, who was part of the high court majority that struck down Roe v. Wade in 2022, wrote a concurrence saying the court was dismissing the case because the facts had changed since it first decided to take it up.
The order did not resolve key questions at the heart of the case, and the issue could come before the high court again soon, though not until after the November presidential election.
While Barrett showed a willingness to depart from the conservative majority at times, she more frequently joined it. Over the course of more than five dozen cases the court considered this year, Barrett joined with the majority 92% of the time, Empirical SCOTUS found. She was in the majority third most often, after Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh. She voted in favor of decisions that weakened federal regulators, allowed more aggressive sweeps of homeless encampments in the West and overturned a federal ban on bump stocks, the rapid-fire gun accessories used the in the nation’s deadliest mass shooting.
“I don’t know that it does make a big difference in the direction of the court. It’s a conservative supermajority, and she’s part of that supermajority,” Murray said. “Most of the time she is with that supermajority, and even when she’s not, it’s at the margins.”
veryGood! (8)
Related
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Did you look at the solar eclipse too long? Doctors explain signs of eye damage
- Broken record: March is 10th straight month to be hottest on record, scientists say
- After Appalachian hospitals merged into a monopoly, their ERs slowed to a crawl
- Trump's 'stop
- The 2024 ACM Awards Nominations Are Here: See the Complete List
- Why Luke Bryan Isn't Shocked About Katy Perry's Departure From American Idol
- Jackie Chan addresses health concerns on his 70th birthday: 'Don't worry!'
- Sam Taylor
- Blaze Bernstein's accused killer Samuel Woodward set to stand trial. Prosecutors call it a hate crime.
Ranking
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Rescue owner sentenced in 'terrible' animal cruelty case involving dead dogs in freezers
- Why Below Deck's Familiar New Stew Is Already Starting Drama on Season 11
- Woman shoots interstate drivers, says God told her to because of the eclipse, Florida police say
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Why is looking at a solar eclipse dangerous without special glasses? Eye doctors explain.
- UConn concludes a dominant run to its 2nd straight NCAA title, beating Zach Edey and Purdue 75-60
- 12-year-old trapped, killed after truck falls into Colorado river
Recommendation
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Clark Effect: Ratings and attendance boost could be on way for WNBA
Clark Effect: Ratings and attendance boost could be on way for WNBA
Disney allowed to pause its federal lawsuit against Florida governor as part of settlement deal
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
How dark will the solar eclipse be? Path of totality gives you a much different experience
The online eclipse experience: People on X get creative, political and possibly blind
Rare copy of comic featuring Superman’s first appearance sells for $6 million at auction